2020年9月10日

D2凍胚解凍後培養24H再植入可能可提高懷孕率


Cryobiology

Volume 95, August 2020, Pages 80-83
Cryobiology

Do different culture intervals (2 × 24 hours) after thaw of cleavage stage embryos affect pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether selecting embryos for transfer after prolonged culture after thaw (18–24 h) has better pregnancy rates than selecting embryos for transfer after short culture after thaw (2–5 h).

We performed a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial, evaluating 388 patients submitted to ART treatment who had embryos frozen on day-2 and subsequently transferred. All patients received the same endometrial priming with estradiol valerate followed by vaginal progesterone. Patients were randomized for Frozen embryo transfer 2–5 h after thaw (Group D2) or 18–24 h after thaw (Group D2/D3). The main Outcome Measure was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) at 20 weeks' gestation per embryo transfer.

A total of 179 patients had embryos transferred 2–5 h after thaw and 209 patients had embryos transferred 18–24 h after thaw. The mean age in group D2 was 36 ± 4.4 and 36 ± 5.4 in group D2/D3. Ongoing pregnancy rate was 28% and 33.5% (p = 0.2) for groups D2 and D2/D3, respectively.

These results suggest that increasing the culture time of embryos in one day to improve selection before transfer does not increase ongoing pregnancy rate. 

2020年9月5日

 電子菸仍會造成精蟲數量下降但不會造成男性賀爾蒙上升

Use of e-cigarettes associated with lower sperm counts in a cross-sectional study of young men from the general population

Human Reproduction, Volume 35, Issue 7, July 2020, Pages 1693–1701, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa089

STUDY QUESTION

Are use of e-cigarettes and snuff associated with testicular function as previously shown for conventional cigarettes and marijuana?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Use of e-cigarettes is associated with reduced semen quality but not with higher serum testosterone level as observed for conventional cigarette use. Snuff use was not associated with markers of testicular function.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Cigarette smoking has previously been associated with higher testosterone levels and impaired semen quality, whereas it is unresolved whether use of e-cigarettes or snuff influence the testicular function.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This cross-sectional population-based study included 2008 men with information on cigarette and marijuana use (enrolled between 2012 and 2018), among whom 1221 men also had information on e-cigarette and snuff use (enrolled between 2015 and 2018).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Men (median age 19.0 years) from the general population provided a semen and blood sample and filled out a questionnaire on lifestyle including information on smoking behaviour. Associations between different types of smoking (e-cigarettes, snuff, marijuana and cigarettes) and reproductive hormones (total and free testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, LH, oestradiol and ratios of inhibin B/FSH, testosterone/LH and free testosterone/LH) and semen parameters (total sperm count and sperm concentration) were examined using multiple linear regression analyses adjusted for relevant confounders.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Approximately half of the men (52%) were cigarette smokers, 13% used e-cigarettes, 25% used snuff and 33% used marijuana. Users of e-cigarettes and marijuana were often also cigarette smokers. Compared to non-users, daily e-cigarette users had significantly lower total sperm count (147 million vs 91 million) as did daily cigarette smokers (139 million vs 103 million), in adjusted analyses. Furthermore, significantly higher total and free testosterone levels were seen in cigarette smoking men (6.2% and 4.1% higher total testosterone and 6.2% and 6.2% higher free testosterone in daily smokers and occasional smokers, respectively, compared to non-smoking men), but not among e-cigarette users. Daily users of marijuana had 8.3% higher total testosterone levels compared to non-users. No associations were observed for snuff in relation to markers of testicular function.

胚胎植入前後使用鎮靜安眠藥valium會增加子宮外孕之機率1.5倍


Benzodiazepine use before conception and risk of ectopic pregnancy 

Human Reproduction, Volume 35, Issue 7, July 2020, Pages 1685–1692, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa082
STUDY QUESTION

Are women who fill a benzodiazepine prescription before conception at increased risk of ectopic pregnancy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Risk of ectopic pregnancy is 50% higher among women who fill a benzodiazepine prescription before conception.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Benzodiazepine use in pregnancy increases the risk of miscarriage, adverse birth outcomes and adverse child development outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Using data from US commercial insurance claims, we performed a cohort study of 1 691 366 pregnancies between 1 November 2008 and 30 September 2015.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We identified ectopic pregnancies using diagnosis and procedure codes and used unadjusted and inverse probability of treatment (IPT)-weighted log-binomial models to calculate relative risks (RR) of ectopic pregnancy for pregnant women who did and did not fill any prescriptions for benzodiazepines in the 90 days before conception. Two sub-groups of women with specific indications for benzodiazepine use were also examined—women who had a least one diagnosis for anxiety disorder and women who had at least one diagnosis of insomnia in the year before conception.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Of the 1 691 366 pregnancies, 1.06% filled at least two benzodiazepine prescriptions totaling at least 10 days supply in the 90 days before conception. Among women with a benzodiazepine prescription, there was an excess of 80 ectopic pregnancies per 10 000 pregnancies, and their IPT-weighted risk of ectopic pregnancies was 1.47 (95% CI 1.32 to 1.63) times greater relative to women without benzodiazepine prescriptions before conception. The IPT-weighted RR between ectopic pregnancy and benzodiazepine use was 1.34 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.53) among women with anxiety disorder diagnoses and 1.28 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.68) among women with an insomnia diagnosis.

凍胚太久(>1 year)可能會下降懷孕率


The effect of storage time after vitrification on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among 24 698 patients following the first embryo transfer cycles 

Human Reproduction, Volume 35, Issue 7, July 2020, Pages 1675–1684, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa136

Abstract
STUDY QUESTION

To evaluate the impact of storage time after vitrification on embryo viability, pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes.

SUMMARY ANSWER

The prolonged storage time of vitrified embryos negatively affected pregnancy outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate; but did not influence neonatal outcomes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Although vitrification has been the fundamental tool of ART treatments in recent years, few studies have explored the influence of storage period after vitrification on embryonic and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective study was performed among 24 698 patients with the first vitrified embryo transfer following a freeze-all strategy during the period from January 2011 to December 2017.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIAL, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 24 698 patients met the inclusion criteria and were grouped according to the storage time (11 330 patients in Group 1 with storage time <3 months, 9614 patients in Group 2 with storage time between 3 and 6 months, 3188 patients in Group 3 with storage time between 6 and 12 months and 566 in Group 4 with storage time between 12 and 24 months). The pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes were compared between different storage time groups. Multivariate logistic regression and linear regression were performed to evaluate the independent effect of storage time on clinical outcomes, adjusting for important confounders.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

After adjustment for potential confounding factors, the chance of biochemical pregnancy (Group 1 as reference; Group 2: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.92, 95% CI 0.87–0.97; Group 3: aOR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.90; Group 4: aOR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.56–0.81), clinical pregnancy (Group 2: aOR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.96; Group 3: aOR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.87; Group 4: aOR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.54–0.79) and live birth (Group 2: aOR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.85–0.95; Group 3: aOR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.91; Group 4: aOR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.48–0.72) significantly decreased with the increasing storage time, whereas the relationship between miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and storage time did not reach statistical significance. In addition, there was no evidence of differences in adverse neonatal outcomes (preterm birth, low birthweight, high birthweight, macrosomia or birth defects) between groups.