單純使用duphaston (10 mg oral dydrogesterone twice daily,) 懷孕率較低於其他三組
compared to
400 mg vaginal progesterone suppository twice daily,
10 mg oral dydrogesterone twice daily combined with injection of 0.1 mg GnRH-α,
10 mg oral dydrogesterone twice daily combined with injection of 1500 IU hCG.
Comparison of four protocols for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed Embryo transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial
Methods: This randomized clinical trial was performed during a 6-month period, including candidates for FET. Patients were randomly assigned to four groups for LPS: 400 mg vaginal progesterone suppository twice daily, 10 mg oral dydrogesterone twice daily, 10 mg oral dydrogesterone twice daily combined with injection of 0.1 mg GnRH-α, and 10 mg oral dydrogesterone twice daily combined with injection of 1500 IU hCG. Primary endpoint included clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and miscarriage rate (MR).
Results: A total of 400 FET cycles were analyzed. CPR was significantly lower in dydrogesterone group (9 %) when compared to vaginal progesterone (20 %), dydrogesterone and GnRH-α (25 %), and dydrogesterone and hCG (17 %). Logistic regression showed that only dydrogesterone group had significantly lower CPR in comparison with vaginal progesterone (OR = 0.39; p = 0.03), while it was comparable between other three groups. There were no significant difference between four groups regarding to OPR and MR.
Conclusion: Vaginal progesterone provides appropriate LPS. Yet, combination of oral dydrogesterone and GnRH-α or hCG can be more suitable option compared to vaginal progesterone for LPS in women with vaginal irritation or discharge at a lower cost.
沒有留言:
張貼留言