囊胚切片和冷凍之間間隔時間過長會影響胚胎著床率
間隔時間超過 1 小時 會顯著影響胚胎存活和臨床結果
囊胚切片和冷凍之間間隔時間過長會影響胚胎著床率
間隔時間超過 1 小時 會顯著影響胚胎存活和臨床結果
鑑定精子缺陷睪丸切片中的差異表達基因
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/rmb2.12616
透過 RNA 定序 (RNA-Seq) 量化轉錄異常精子的睪丸組織中差異表達的轉錄本,從而揭示過濾差異表達基因(DEG) 透過 qRT-PCR 驗證了選定的 10 個 DEG,並在睪丸活檢中確定了兩種蛋白質的定位。找出調節精子形態和功能的新基因。
分析揭示 6 個基因(SPATA31E1、TEKT3、SLC9C1、PDE4A、CFAP47 和 TNC)與人類精子發育高度相關
睪丸切片兩種蛋白 ORAI1 和 SPATA31E1 的免疫組織化學定位證實在發育中的人類生殖細胞中表達,其中 SPATA31E1 在晚期精母細胞和精子細胞表現明顯
此研究方法可找出了影響人類生殖細胞的基因及相關蛋白
Human testis biopsies were collected from men with well-characterized phenotypes of normal spermatogenesis, spermatid arrest, and Sertoli cell-only phenotype, and transcriptional differences were quantified by RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were filtered based on predominant expression in spermatids and gene functional annotations relevant to sperm morphology and motility. Selected 10 DEGs were validated by qRT-PCR and the localization of two proteins was determined in testis biopsies.
The analysis revealed 6 genes (SPATA31E1, TEKT3, SLC9C1, PDE4A, CFAP47, and TNC) that are excellent candidates for novel genes enriched in developing human sperm. The immunohistochemical localization of two proteins, ORAI1 and SPATA31E1, in testis biopsies, verified that both are expressed in developing human germ cells, with SPATA31E1 enriched in late spermatocytes and spermatids.
Vitamin D (VD) 血清濃度高低與試管懷孕率無明顯差異
補充Vit D 是否提升懷孕率仍具爭議
Original ArticleVolume 122, Issue 5p866-874November 2024
Vitamin D levels in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: lack of association with embryo quality or pregnancy rates
Objective
To investigate the potential impact of vitamin D (VD) serum levels on couples going through in vitro fertilization treatment in terms of embryo quality and pregnancy rates.
Patient(s)
A total of 267 couples underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injections between January 2017 and March 2019.
Intervention(s)
The couples were categorized into four groups on the basis of 25-hydroxy VD (25OHD) levels measured at the beginning of the stimulation protocol: group 1 with 25OHD levels ≥30 ng/mL for both women and men; group 2 with 25OHD levels <30 ng/mL for both; group 3 women with 25OHD levels <30 ng/mL and men with 25OHD levels ≥30 ng/mL; and group 4 with women with 25OHD level ≥30 ng/mL and men with 25OHD level <30 ng/mL.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
We consider the quantity and quality of embryos during the cleavage as well as blastocyst stages as primary outcomes. Correspondingly, the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) was regarded as a secondary outcome.
Result(s)
Our findings revealed no significant correlations between the studied VD groups and the evaluated outcomes. This includes the quantity and quality of embryos during the cleavage and blastocyst stages, as well as the CPR. Primary analysis revealed a small but statistically significant difference in the duration of controlled ovarian stimulation between group 1 and group 2 (95% confidence interval, 0.07–3.04) and between group 1 and group 3 (95% confidence interval, 0.05–3.23).
Conclusion(s)
The present study found no correlation between the studied VD levels and the quantity as well as quality of cleavage or blastocyst stage embryos, nor did it show any impact on CPRs. Further well-designed, prospective studies are warranted to determine whether and how vitamin D affects reproductive outcome
捐卵冷凍或新鮮卵子或胚胎植入後懷孕率無明顯差異
Trends and outcomes of fresh and frozen donor oocyte cycles in the United States
Cover Image - Fertility and Sterility, Volume 122, Issue 5
Objective
To examine trends, characteristics, and outcomes of donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles by original oocyte and resultant embryo state and determine whether oocyte state (fresh or frozen) is differentially associated with clinical pregnancy, live birth, and term, healthy birthweight neonates among singleton live births.
Patient(s)
Patients undergoing donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles in the United States reporting to the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System from 2013 to 2020.
Annual numbers and proportions of total donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles stratified by oocyte and embryo state and single embryo transfer cycles resulting in the live birth of term (≥37 weeks gestation), healthy birthweight (≥2,500 g) singletons during 2013–2020. Rates of live birth and term, healthy birthweight neonates among singleton live births for 2018–2020 are also reported. Relative risks examine associations between donor oocyte state and live birth and term, healthy birthweight neonates among singleton live births resulting from donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles.
Result(s)
From 2013 to 2020, there were 135,085 donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles, of which the proportions increased for frozen embryos (42.3%–76.6%), fresh embryos using frozen donor oocytes (19.9%–68.3%) and single embryo transfers (36.4%–85.5%). During 2018–2020, there were 48,679 donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles. Rates of live birth were lower with frozen compared with fresh donor oocytes for both fresh (46.2%, 55.9%; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–0.87) and frozen (41.3%, 45.8%; aRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91–0.98) embryo transfer cycles. Among singleton live births, rates of delivering a term, healthy birth weight neonate were similar for frozen compared with fresh donor oocyte transfer cycles among fresh (77.3%, 77.2%; aRR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.98–1.03) and frozen (75.6%, 75.1%; aRR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99–1.04) embryos.
Conclusion(s)
In this national study of donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles, frozen embryo transfers, fresh embryo transfers using frozen oocytes, and single embryo transfers increased. Although frozen compared with fresh oocytes were associated with a slightly reduced rate of live birth, rates of term, healthy birthweight neonates among singleton live births were comparable between donor oocyte states.
如何進行發育第3天胚胎品質評估與分級?
胚葉細胞數量
取卵後 48 小時,胚胎應有 2~ 4 個細胞,
在 72 小時內約 7~10 個細胞。
胚胎內碎片化程度
碎片(Fragment),是胚胎細胞的一部分並與細胞的有核部分分離的過程。優選具有很少的碎片或沒有碎片。
碎片百分比。破碎率太高的胚胎植入潛力較低。
A級: 無碎片: 著床率優
B級: <10%碎片: 著床率優,等同A級
C級: 10%~50%碎片: 著床率較低
D級: >50%碎片: 著床率極低
胚葉細胞多核心的存在
其他因素
不孕症或懷孕前後安眠藥物之使用概念
安眠藥分類
BZD類 |
FDA等級 |
Alprazolam (Xanax) |
D |
Diazepam (valium) |
D |
Lorazepam (Ativan) |
D |
|
|
Z系列 |
|
Zaleplon (Sonaplon) |
C |
Zolpidem (史蒂諾斯) |
C |
Zopiclone (Imovane) |
C |
|
|
抗組織胺 |
|
Diphenhydramine |
B |
Doxylamine |
A |
Hydroxyzine |
C |
Zolpidem對懷孕胚胎或嬰兒之影響
l
在zolpidem最高劑量的5-10倍劑量下,沒有對於老鼠或兔子寶寶胚胎的藥物毒性,致畸胎性在每一種劑量下都沒有出現。
l
但在zolpidem超高劑量組(相當人類建議最高劑量的10-20倍的劑量下),有受精卵著床失敗增加。
l
懷孕過程中服用zolpidem超過90天,與寶寶出生體重較輕、早產、剖腹產有關。不過在生下畸胎兒的比率上,並沒有顯著的差異。
l
沒有證據顯示服用Stillnox會降低男性或女性的生育能力。
l
Zolpidem在美國FDA懷孕分級中被歸類為C級,動物試驗發現zolpidem可能致畸胎或對胚胎產生損害,是否會對人類有同樣的影響還無法得知。
故目前此藥對於孕婦非絕對禁忌,應權衡利害謹慎使用。
l
不建議懷孕期間使用Stillnox,因為對其對嬰兒的影響知之甚少。
Ativan對懷孕胚胎或嬰兒之影響
l 兔子的研究上發現異常與Ativan的劑量無關。在高於
l
BZD類藥物可能與早產,寶寶體重較低有關,
l 少數研究認為Ativan與唇裂有關‧
l
Ativan使用於胚胎植入期間對於懷孕率活產率無明顯影響
l
胚胎移植期間使用Ativan並未顯示出對包括活產率在內的生殖結果的明顯影響,顯示其在影響IVF成功率方面的效果有限。
總結
l
每天睡眠時間不到6個小時的女性,容易會造成賀爾蒙失調,卵巢功能干擾‧
l
所有安眠藥會透過胎盤,讓寶寶也接觸到。要注意出生之後的戒斷症狀。寶寶出生後可能需要住院幾天進行額外監測。
l
孕媽咪及哺乳期服用安眠藥恐透過血液或是泌乳對於胎兒造成不良影響。
l
懷孕前後失眠建議先選用抗組織胺(FDA分級A或B),比較安全。
l
失眠太嚴重,需要使用安眠藥物,考慮使用Z系列安眠藥如使蒂諾斯(FDA分級C級藥物)。
l
不建議使用屬於BZD類安眠藥(FDA分級D級藥物) 。
l
懷孕前後服用安眠藥應諮詢您的醫生決定是否更換更適合藥物。
l
提供病患舒適、放鬆的環境,透過親朋好友,嘗試各種方式來支持媽咪好孕。
植入前非整倍體基因檢測(PGT-A)的使用一直在穩定增加。用於 24 染色體分析的基礎技術繼續快速發展。
PGT-A 作為所有接受體外受精患者的常規篩檢測試的價值尚未得到證實。
儘管一些早期的單中心研究報告稱,預後良好的患者在PGT-A 後的活產率較高,
但最近對具有可用囊胚的女性進行的多中心隨機對照試驗得出結論,
透過冷凍胚胎移植的整體妊娠結局在PGT-A 之間是相似的。
PGT-A 降低臨床流產風險的價值尚不清楚。
結論: 美國不孕權威期刊仍不建議常規使用PGT於所有試管病患,
PGT之使用並無法明顯提升一般病患之累積懷孕率
Diazepam 安眠藥使用於胚胎植入期間對於懷孕率活產律無明顯影響
Methods: Data from 5607 embryo transfers, encompassing 465 cases with diazepam administration, were retrospectively analyzed. The study included single blastocyst transfers from 12 clinics in Portugal and Spain between January 2015 and December 2022.
Results: Comparison of reproductive outcomes between patients receiving diazepam and those who did not showed no statistically significant differences. Positive beta-hCG rates (60.8% non-diazepam vs. 60.4% diazepam, p = 0.92, adjusted p = 0.32) and clinical pregnancy rates (45.6% non-diazepam vs. 46.2% diazepam, p = 0.81, adjusted p = 0.11) were comparable. Miscarriage rates (11.0% diazepam vs. 9.3% non-diazepam, p = 0.25, adjusted p = 0.26) and ectopic pregnancy rates (0.9% diazepam vs. 0.1% non-diazepam, p = 0.1, adjusted p = 0.20) were similar. Live birth rates (36.3% non-diazepam vs. 35.3% diazepam, p = 0.69, adjusted p = 0.82) and prematurity rates (0.3% non-diazepam vs. 0% diazepam, p > 0.99, adjusted p = 0.99) also exhibited no statistically significant differences.
Conclusions: Based on the results, diazepam administration during embryo transfer did not show a discernible impact on reproductive outcomes, including live birth rates, suggesting its limited effectiveness in enhancing success.