2026年3月9日

接受微流控精子製備的患者與接受標準精子處理進行體外受精 (IVF) 和卵胞漿內單精子注射 (ICSI) 的患者相比,其卵裂期和囊胚期胚胎質量以及臨床妊娠率和持續妊娠率相似。


Randomized Controlled Trial
 
2022 Jun 30;37(7):1406-1413.
 doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac099.

Microfluidic preparation of spermatozoa for ICSI produces similar embryo quality to density-gradient centrifugation: a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial

Study question: Does processing of spermatozoa for IVF with ICSI by a microfluidic sperm separation device improve embryo quality compared with density-gradient centrifugation?

Summary answer: Patients randomized to microfluidic sperm preparation had similar cleavage- and blastocyst-stage embryo quality and clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates to those who underwent standard sperm processing for IVF with ICSI.

What is known already: Microfluidic sperm preparation can isolate spermatozoa for clinical use with minimal DNA fragmentation but with unclear impact on clinical outcomes.

Study design, size, duration: A prospective randomized controlled trial of 386 patients planning IVF from June 2017 through September 2021 was carried out.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: One hundred and ninety-two patients were allocated to sperm processing with a microfluidic sperm separation device for ICSI, while 194 patients were allocated to clinical standard density-gradient centrifugation (control) at an academic medical centre.

Main results and the role of chance: In an intention to treat analysis, there were no differences in high-quality cleavage-stage embryo fraction [66.0 (25.8)% control versus 68.0 (30.3) microfluidic sperm preparation, P = 0.541, absolute difference -2.0, 95% CI (-8.5, 4.5)], or high-quality blastocyst fraction [37.4 (25.4) control versus 37.4 (26.2) microfluidic sperm preparation, P = 0.985, absolute difference -0.6 95% CI (-6, 5.9)] between groups. There were no differences in the clinical pregnancy or ongoing pregnancy rates between groups.

沒有留言:

張貼留言