1. 輸卵管攝影無法取代子宮鏡檢查
2. 重複試管嬰兒失敗不孕症患者需施行子宮鏡檢查
3. 高齡患者需施行子宮鏡檢查
4. 不明原因之不孕症患者需施行子宮鏡檢查
5. 男性不孕症患者較少需施行子宮鏡檢查
Fertil Steril.
2011 Aug;96(2):349-352.e2. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
Comparison of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of
the uterine cavity in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.
Source
In Vitro Fertilization Unit, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara,
Turkey. eclamptic2000@yahoo.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography (HSG) for
intracavitary and structural uterine pathologies in comparison with hysteroscopy
(HS) in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer and
also to specify the patients who should be subjected to HS in the early stages
of an infertility work-up.
DESIGN:
Retrospective analysis.
SETTING:
IVF unit of a university hospital.
PATIENT(S):
Three hundred fifty-nine consecutive women who underwent both HSG and HS for
infertility investigation.
INTERVENTION(S):
HS and HSG.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):
HS findings.
RESULT(S):
HSG shows a sensitivity of 21.56%, specificity of 83.76%, positive predictive
value of 55.26%, and negative predictive value of 70.75%. Its false-negative
rate is 78.43%, and its false-positive rate is 16.23%. Overall agreement between
the two procedures is 68.9%. The risk of abnormal HS increases with advancing
patient age and duration of infertility. Risk increments associated with patient
age over 35 years and increasing number of previous assisted reproductive
techniques (ART) persist even in the presence of a normal HSG. As expected, we
encounter significantly less abnormal HS in the male factor infertility
group.
CONCLUSION(S):
HS should be performed especially in patients older than 35 years of age
and/or with a history of two or more previous ART trials even in the presence of
a normal HSG. HSG shows unconvincing diagnostic value for intracavitary and
structural uterine pathologies in infertility evaluation.
沒有留言:
張貼留言