低分子量肝素heparin可能有助於防止IVF習慣性流產
http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/674.abstract
Adjunct low-molecular-weight heparin to improve live birth rate after recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND Poor fertility outcomes in women with recurrent implantation failure (≥RIF) present significant challenges in assisted reproduction, and various adjuncts, including heparin, are used for potential improvement in pregnancy rates. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) on live birth rates (LBRs) and implantation rates (IRs) in women with RIF and undergoing IVF.
METHODS Studies comparing LMWH versus control/placebo in women with RIF were searched for on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, conference proceedings and databases for registered and ongoing trials (1980–2012). Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1. The main outcome measure was LBR per woman.
RESULTS Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one quasi-randomized trial met the inclusion criteria. One study included women with at least one thrombophilia ( Qublan et al., 2008) and two studies included women with unexplained RIF ( Urman et al., 2009; Berker et al., 2011). Pooled risk ratios in women with ≥3 RIF (N = 245) showed a significant improvement in the LBR (risk ratio (RR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.10–2.90, P = 0.02) and a reduction in the miscarriage rate (RR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.06–0.78, P = 0.02) with LMWH compared with controls. The IR for ≥3 RIF (N = 674) showed a non-significant trend toward improvement (RR = 1.73, 95% CI 0.98–3.03, P = 0.06) with LMWH. However, the beneficial effect of LMWH was not significant when only studies with unexplained RIF were pooled. The summary analysis for the numbers needed to be treated with LMWH showed that approximately eight women would require treatment to achieve one extra live birth.
CONCLUSIONS In women with ≥3 RIF, the use of adjunct LMWH significantly improves LBR by 79% compared with the control group; however, this is to be considered with caution, since the overall number of participants in the studies was small. Further evidence from adequately powered multi-centered RCTs is required prior to recommending LMWH for routine clinical use. This review highlights the need for future basic science and clinical research in this important field.
沒有留言:
張貼留言