更能達到誘導排卵之效果
誘導排卵過程中,施打FSH劑量不可下降過快造成體內FSH濃度下降過快,對生長中卵泡造成不利影響,甚至 atresia
GnRH agonist flare-up 容易造成卵巢過大水瘤之產生
自然周期療法之試管嬰兒懷孕率仍舊偏低(<20%)
clomid+FSH+GnRHantagonist在溫和誘導排卵過程可達到類似Long protocol+FSH之懷孕率
Clomid缺點: 耗損子宮內膜estrogen receptor
FSH施打劑量過高或血清,E2濃度過高,OHSS可能對卵子染色體與胚胎著床率產生不良影響
低劑量,較溫和之誘導排卵將是未來IVF誘導排卵之主流
Figure 1
Schematic representation of life history of ovarian follicles: endowment and maintenance, initial recruitment, maturation, atresia or cyclic recruitment, ovulation, and exhaustion. Adapted from McGee and Hsueh (2000).
Study | Inclusion criteria | Study protocol | Control stimulation protocol | Main outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
MacDougallet al. (1994) | Patients ≤38 years with >1 year of infertility, spontaneous ovulatory regular cycles and normal semen analysis | CC 100 mg, from Days 2–6, hCG when the leading follicle was 17 mm (n = 16) | Natural cycle IVF with hCG when the leading follicle was 17 mm (n = 14) | Cancellation rate 0 versus 71%. Ongoing pregnancy rate 13 versus 0% (NS) |
Dhont et al. (1995) | Patients with no previous IVF attempts. Treatment included IVF-ET, ZIFT and GIFT | OAC pretreatment, CC 100 mg for 5 Days and (150) subsequent HMG (n = 151) | OAC pretreatment, long acting GnRH agonist and (300 IU) HMG (n = 152) | Cancellation rate 20.5 versus 2.6%. Ongoing pregnancy rate 24.5 versus 36.8% (P = 0.02) |
Ingerslevet al. (2001) | Couples with no previous IVF attempts under 35 years with ICSI indication, tubal factor or idiopathic infertility | CC 100 mg, from Days 3–7 and hCG when the leading follicle was ≥20 mm (68 patients, 111 cycles) | Natural cycle IVF with hCG when the leading follicle was ≥17 mm (64 patients, 114 cycles) | Cycles resulting in embryo transfer 53.2 versus 25.4%. Ongoing pregnancy rate (per cycle) 18.0versus 3.5% (P < 0.001) |
Fiedler et al. (2001) (abstract) | Random selected normal cycling women | 100 mg CC CD 5–9, from Day 9 additional 150 IU HMG or FSH. GnRH antagonist from Day 10 (n = 295) | 100 mg CC CD 5–9, from Day 9 additional 150 IU HMG or FSH (n = 291) | Ongoing pregnancy rate 23 versus 21% (NS) |
Weigert et al. (2002) | Women with no previous IVF cycles, between 20 and 39 years, with normal ovulatory cycles with tubal, male factor or unexplained infertility | OAC pretreatment. CC 100 mg for 5 days in combination with 225 IU of rFSH and 75 IU of rLH on alternate days (n = 154) | Long GnRH suppression and 150 IU rFSH (n = 140) | Ongoing pregnancy rate 35 versus 29% (NS) |
Engel et al. (2003) | Healthy female partners of infertile couples, between 18 and 39 years, with regular cycle length. No more than three previous IVF cycles or basal FSH >10 IU/l | Single dose GnRH antagonist protocol. CC 100 mg CD 2–6 of 3–7, CD 6 start 150 IU rFSH (n= 5) | Single dose GnRH antagonist protocol. CC 100 mg CD 2–6 of 3–7, CD 6 start 150 IU HMG (n = 5) | Live birth rate 40 versus 20% (NS) |
Lin et al. (2006) | Couples with male-factor infertility who were about to undergo their first ICSI cycle | CC/HMG. Cetrorelix protocol (n= 60) | buserelin long protocol (n = 60) | Pregnancy rate 41.7 versus 40% (NS) |
沒有留言:
張貼留言